Big Data is not Big Intelligence. Data-Mining tools (e.g., ChatGPT) are not AI tools because Data-Mining tools are copycats without intelligence. If education is to make students to become copycats with intelligence, how could we reply on copycats without intelligence to educate copycats with intelligence? – Xie Ming
2 thoughts on “Disaster in Educating Kids in the Age of A.I.”
Leave a Reply Cancel reply
Related Posts
Why 《Nature 自然》期刊 Journal Accepts Fake Papers?
- robotics
- May 6, 2026
- 1 min read
- 0
Why 《Nature 自然》期刊 Journal Accepts Fake Papers? 5月6日,同济大学发布一则情况通报,内容如下: 近日,针对网络上对我校教师王某相关论文数据存疑的反映,学校成立调查组认真核查,并对涉及的学术问题进行评议。有关情况通报如下。 受质疑论文“Human HDAC6 senses valine abundancy to […]

Xie Ming raises a really important point – are we in danger of prioritizing rote learning and mimicry over genuine understanding by relying too heavily on tools like ChatGPT? I agree that if education becomes simply about producing “copycats with intelligence,” we need to seriously reconsider how AI is integrated into the learning process. It’s a valuable warning about the potential pitfalls.
Xie Ming’s distinction between “Big Data” and “Big Intelligence” really resonates, especially the concern that “Data-Mining tools are copycats without intelligence.” It’s a crucial point to consider as we integrate AI into education. The question of whether we risk making students into “copycats with intelligence” by relying on tools that lack true understanding is a valuable warning about the potential pitfalls.